Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

A matrix metalloproteinase-generated neoepitope of CRP can identify knee and multi-joint inflammation in osteoarthritis

Arthritis Research & Therapy volume 23, Article number: 226 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

To compare C-reactive protein (CRP) and matrix metalloproteinase-generated neoepitope of CRP (CRPM) as biomarkers of inflammation and radiographic severity in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Methods

Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (n=25) of at least one knee underwent knee radiographic imaging and radionuclide etarfolatide imaging to quantify inflammation of the knees and other appendicular joints. For purposes of statistical analysis, semi-quantitative etarfolatide and radiographic imaging scores were summed across the knees; etarfolatide scores were also summed across all joints to provide a multi-joint synovitis measure. Multiple inflammation and collagen-related biomarkers were measured by ELISA including CRP, CRPM, MMP-generated neoepitopes of type I collagen and type III collagen in serum (n=25), and CD163 in serum (n=25) and synovial fluid (n=18).

Results

BMI was associated with CRP (p=0.001), but not CRPM (p=0.753). Adjusting for BMI, CRP was associated with radiographic knee osteophyte score (p=0.002), while CRPM was associated with synovitis of the knee (p=0.017), synovitis of multiple joints (p=0.008), and macrophage marker CD163 in serum (p=0.009) and synovial fluid (p=0.03). CRP correlated with MMP-generated neoepitope of type I collagen in serum (p=0.045), and CRPM correlated with MMP-generated neoepitope of type III collagen in serum (p<0.0001). No biomarkers correlated with age, knee pain, or WOMAC pain.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first time that CRPM has been shown to be associated with knee and multi-joint inflammation based on objective imaging (etarfolatide) and biomarker (CD163) measures. These results demonstrate the capability of biomarker measurements to reflect complex biological processes and for neoepitope markers to more distinctly reflect acute processes than their precursor proteins. CRPM is a promising biomarker of local and systemic inflammation in knee OA that is associated with cartilage degradation and is independent of BMI. CRPM is a potential molecular biomarker alternative to etarfolatide imaging for quantitative assessment of joint inflammation.

Background

Osteoarthritis (OA) is increasingly understood to be a disease associated with low-grade innate immune activation [1,2,3] warranting further studies of inflammatory markers in knee OA. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a well-studied inflammation-related molecule associated with many chronic inflammatory diseases, such as acute and chronic heart failure, coronary heart disease, and inflammatory bowel disease [4,5,6,7,8,9]. CRP has been associated with pain and decreased function in knee OA patients; however, its associations with radiographic features of OA are confounded by body mass index (BMI) [7, 10]. A prospective cohort also found that associations of CRP with incidence of knee and hip OA in women with metabolic syndrome were not significant after adjustment for BMI [11]. In the Chingford study, high serum CRP concentrations were associated with incidence of radiographic knee OA across multiple timepoints; however, this association was also not significant after adjustment for BMI [12]. In a meta-analysis of 32 studies, serum hsCRP concentrations were elevated in knee OA patients and associated with pain and decreased physical function, but were not associated with radiographic OA measures across the studies [10]. Taken together, these studies all suggest that BMI confounds associations of CRP with radiographic OA, therefore, the utility of CRP as an independent biomarker of OA, is unclear.

In an effort to overcome potential shortcomings of CRP, an assay has been developed to detect CRPM—a neoepitope of CRP generated by matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-cleavage (after amino acid 25) (Fig. 1) [17]. CRP is produced in the liver, then is likely bound by Fcγ receptor II on macrophages and processed by MMPs in inflamed tissues, creating CRPM which may reflect local inflammation [17, 18]. In theory, MMP-generated neoepitope markers may be ideal OA disease activity markers because MMPs are particularly active in inflamed knees and are involved in the pathological matrix remodeling of OA. For instance, inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α activate MMPs, which cleave extracellular matrix proteins such as collagen, thereby destabilizing and degrading tissues [19]. We hypothesize that MMP-mediated cleavage products of OA-related molecules better reflect pathological turnover than their un-cleaved counterparts [20]. To test this hypothesis, we compared associations of CRPM and CRP with OA relevant indicators.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Generation of neoepitopes by MMPs*. Type I and type III collagen α1 strands are cleaved between amino acid 775 and 776 by MMPs-1, 8, 13, 14, or MT3-MMP [13]. Type I collagen fragments can be cleaved by MMP-2, 9, or 13 between amino acids 764 and 765, forming the neoepitope C1M [14]. The type III collagen fragment can be cleaved by MMP-9 or 12 between amino acids 609 and 610 to form C3M [15, 16]. CRP can be cleaved by MMP-1 or 8 between amino acid 24 and 25 to form CRPM [17].

*Figure made with https://biorender.com/

Full size image

Studies to date demonstrate distinct differences between CRP and CRPM. A study comparing high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) and CRPM concentrations in the same cohort found that these biomarkers were not correlated; in fact, only 6% of patients (mean BMI of 31.0 kg/m2) had high concentrations of both markers [21]. Furthermore, in non-obese participants, 13% had high CRPM only and 12% had high hsCRP only, suggesting distinct subgroups of OA patients with elevations of each biomarker [21]. Another study of OA and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cohorts found that serum CRPM was elevated in patients with knee OA, and moderate to high CRPM concentrations were associated with incidence of contralateral knee OA [22]. One third of these OA patients had similar CRPM concentrations to the RA cohort, suggesting a clear inflammatory phenotypic subgroup in OA [22]. High CRPM concentrations have been associated with pain sensitization in a manner independent of high sensitivity CRP and BMI [23]. In the OA LIFE study, weight loss in OA patients was associated with decreases in IL-6 and hsCRP [24]; similarly, in the IDEA exercise and diet intervention trial, weight loss was also associated with decreases in IL-6 and CRPM [25]. These findings prompted this study to investigate associations of CRPM, hsCRP, and cartilage degradation markers with localized knee and multi-joint inflammation and knee radiographic OA severity.

Methods

Participants

All procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Duke University Medical Center. This study represents a secondary analysis of samples derived from a previously reported pilot trial (NCT01237405) to assess joint inflammation using radionuclide etarfolatide imaging in individuals (n=25) with radiographic knee OA [25]. Etarfolatide (99mTC-EC20) uptake through folate receptors is indicative of inflammation due to activated macrophages and neutrophils [26, 27]. In brief, 25 participants were recruited as described previously [26] based on radiographic OA (Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) scores of 1–4) in at least one knee, 18 years or older, knee pain in the index knee on most days during 1 month of the past year. Note that participants were excluded if they had a history of immune-compromising conditions, current immune-modulating therapies, or recent surgery. The mean age was 62.4 years, mean BMI 29.2 kg/m2, and 72% were female. Joint pain, aching, or stiffness were assessed by National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) I criteria [28]; joint pain, stiffness, and daily function were assessed by the Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index [29]. Serum and plasma samples were obtained from all participants (n=25). Synovial fluid (SF) samples (n=28) available for this study were all obtained by direct aspiration from 18 individuals: 10 participants had samples from both knees, 5 from the right knee only, and 3 from the left knee only.

Imaging

Knee radiographs were acquired using the Synaflexer frame as previously described and scored for K-L grade, joint space narrowing (JSN), and osteophyte severity (OST) using a standardized atlas by two trained readers blinded to clinical data and other imaging information with high reliability [26]. For purposes of statistical analysis, radiographic scores for both knees were summed for K-L grade (range 0–8), JSN (range 0–6), and OST (range 0–12). Etarfolatide imaging and scoring were performed as described previously [25]. For this study, intensity scores (0–3) of etarfolatide uptake were computed for 4 sites of each knee: medial and lateral synovial joint lining, and medial and lateral intra-articular sites of additional uptake indicative of localized hypertrophic synovium (score range 0–12 per knee). For purposes of statistical analysis, knee etarfolatide scores were summed for both knees (range 0–24). In addition, whole-body planar images were scored (0–3) for uptake across each of 30 joint sites: bilateral glenohumeral and acromioclavicular shoulders, elbows, wrists, hands (finger joints), thumb bases, hips, sacroiliac, medial and lateral ankles, forefoot, big toes, and sternoclavicular joints; and unilateral cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine, and manubriosternal joint. A multi-joint etarfolatide score representing multi-joint synovitis was computed by summing scores for all scored joints including both knees.

Biomarker quantification

Sera and plasma were available for 25 participants; SF samples were available for 18 participants. Serum samples were assayed in duplicate by ELISA for the following biomarkers: C1M (Nordic Bioscience), C3M (Nordic Bioscience), high sensitivity CRP (hsCRP; MP Biomedicals, catalog#: 07BC-1119), and matrix metalloproteinase-generated CRP (CRPM; Nordic Bioscience). Mean intra-assay CVs were <3.4%, and no samples were below the limit of detection (Table 1). Assays from Nordic Bioscience were validated by the company based on the following parameters: inter- and intra-assay variation (<15%), analyte stability (<±20% variation in recovery in response to freeze-thaw, stress test, long term storage), interference (<20% in the presence of biotin, lipids, immunoglobulins, and hemolysis), and analytical specificity and sensitivity (the smallest amount of substance in a sample that can accurately be measured) for recognizing the first 6 amino acids of the neoepitopes compared to a truncated and an elongated version of that peptide with <1% displacement of the signal. The standards for each of the assays are peptides that correspond to the first 10 amino acids of the neoepitopes used to produce the monoclonal antibodies for the ELISAs [14,15,16,17]. As previously reported [30], plasma and synovial fluid samples were assayed for MMP-3, MMP-9, tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1), plasma CRP using the high sensitivity multiplex immunoassay Myriad Human InflammationMAP1.0 (Rules Based Medicine), and for neutrophil elastase (NE) quantified by ELISA (ThermoFisher, catalog#: BMS269, Waltham, MA) with intra-assay CVs <7%. Only two samples (8.0%) had plasma MMP-9 values below the lower limit of detection (LLOD) and thus were imputed based on an established method [31] as 1/2 LLOD; all other biomarkers had detectable concentrations. Serum CD163, plasma CD14, and SF CD163 and CD14 were quantified as reported previously [32], using Quantikine Human soluble CD163 and soluble CD14 immunoassays (R&D Systems) ELISAs; intra-assay CVs ranged from 1.2–9.2% and no values were below the LLOD.

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of biomarkers
Full size table

Statistical analyses

For purposes of statistical analyses, knee radiographic measures and etarfolatide scores were summed for both knees per individual. For synovial fluid analyses, 1 knee per individual was selected: 8 participants had SF samples from 1 knee, 10 participants had SF samples from both knees, and 1 of these knees was randomly selected for analysis. Medians and ranges were calculated for all biomarkers, as was the ratio of plasma MMP-3 to plasma TIMP-1 (Table 1). Unadjusted Spearman correlations (GraphPad 9, San Diego, CA) were used to evaluate associations of the primary serum biomarkers (C1M, C3M, hsCRP, and CRPM) with: age; BMI; pain, aching, stiffness (PAS) NHANES I scores; WOMAC pain question 1 scores; etarfolatide uptake scores representing synovitis of both knees; total etarfolatide scores representing multi-joint synovitis; sum of knee K-L grades; sum knee OST scores; sum knee JSN scores; and concentrations of the other biomarkers (plasma MMP-3, MMP-9, TIMP-1, MMP-3/TIMP-1, CD14, and CRP; serum CD163; synovial fluid MMP-3, MMP-9, NE, CD163, and CD14). Spearman correlations of primary biomarkers with OA radiographic measures, etarfolatide knee synovitis, and multi-joint synovitis were adjusted for age, BMI, and sum K-L grade (JMP Pro 15; SAS, Cary, NC).

Results

hsCRP, but not CRPM, correlated with radiographic OA

Serum hsCRP, but not serum CRPM, correlated with BMI, sum K-L, and sum OST; after adjusting for age and BMI, hsCRP correlated with sum OST only (Spearman partial correlation r=0.505, p=0.014), and not sum K-L grade. Neither of these biomarkers correlated with age, PAS (pain) score, or WOMAC pain questions 1–5 (Table 2). Due to the high correlation (rs=0.99, Table 2) of serum and plasma CRP, only serum hsCRP was used for further analyses described below.

Table 2 Spearman correlations of biomarkers with clinical variables
Full size table

CRPM, but not hsCRP, correlated with knee and multi-joint inflammation

In contrast to OA severity variables, serum CRPM, but not serum hsCRP, was correlated with knee joint inflammation as quantified by intensity of etarfolatide uptake by the knees (Table 2). Interestingly, the correlation of serum CRPM with knee synovitis was statistically significant with adjustment for age, BMI, and sum K-L grade of knees (partial Spearman correlation=0.610, p=0.003). In further contrast to hsCRP, serum CRPM also correlated with multi-joint synovitis (Table 2); the correlation was statistically significant adjusting for age, BMI, and sum K-L (partial Spearman correlation=0.564, p=0.006). Additionally, BMI correlated only with hsCRP and not CRPM or other serum biomarkers (Table 2).

CRPM correlated strongly with MMP-cleaved type III collagen (C3M)

Underscoring the separate biological mechanisms that give rise to these biomarkers, serum hsCRP and CRPM were not correlated (Table 3). Despite the correlation of C3M and C1M, serum C3M (MMP-cleaved type III collagen) correlated significantly with serum CRPM only; in contrast, C1M (MMP-cleaved type I collagen) correlated significantly with serum hsCRP only (Table 3). Correlations of serum C3M with etarfolatide knee and multi-joint synovitis scores (rs=0.34, p<0.1 for both) suggest that C3M too may be predictive of synovitis (Table 2). C1M was not correlated with radiographic or etarfolatide knee scores (p>0.26) nor with any plasma or SF MMP concentrations (Tables 2 and 3). Interestingly, both serum CRPM and serum C3M were moderately correlated with serum and SF CD163, a marker of activated macrophages (Table 3).

Table 3 Spearman cross-correlations of biomarkers
Full size table

Discussion

Etarfolatide imaging of the knees and multi-joint synovitis is an effective, yet complex, measure of neutrophil and macrophage activation requiring radioisotope injections [27], whereas serum CRPM—strongly correlated with etarfolatide scores—requires only a relatively simple blood draw. Furthermore, CRPM was not associated with BMI. Taken together, these results suggest that CRPM is a better disease activity and inflammation indicator in OA than CRP. Although etarfolatide imaging can in theory represent both macrophage and neutrophil infiltration of synovium, there was no correlation of CRPM with SF neutrophil elastase that is highly specific for the presence of synovial fluid neutrophils [28], suggesting that CRPM is more likely to have been generated by activated macrophages in inflamed OA joints.

Serum hsCRP, by contrast, was not associated with measures of activated macrophages, but instead was associated with BMI and C1M in this and other studies [21, 23, 24]. After adjustment for BMI, hsCRP correlated only with sum OST and not sum K-L. Few other studies have identified associations between radiographic measures and hsCRP, suggesting it lacks generalizability across different OA patient subgroups [11, 12, 24]. As an acute phase protein, CRP is generated in response to inflammation and infection and has been considered a measure of systemic inflammation; but its associations with BMI, race, heart disease, and gender confound its diagnostic capability—particularly in OA—a disease associated with gender and high BMI [7,8,9]. These results suggest that CRPM is an OA activity marker while hsCRP is an anatomic or structural biomarker indicating severity of radiographic OA. The unique correlations of CRPM with C3M, and of hsCRP with C1M, suggest that C3M and C1M are activity and structural markers, respectively.

When assessed together, the associations of these four biomarkers point to the underlying processes in inflamed synovial tissue (Fig. 2). Firstly, type I and III collagen production is upregulated by pro-inflammatory cytokines and concentrations of these collagens are elevated within osteoarthritic cartilage [34, 35]. Subsequently, these collagens are processed by MMPs into C1M and C3M, as substantiated ex vivo by pro-inflammatory cytokine treatment (tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and IL-1β) of synovial membranes [34,35,36]. In addition, TNF-α and IL-1β induce production of IL-6, which induces production of CRP that can then be cleaved into CRPM [17, 33, 35, 36]. In fact, tocilizumab (anti-IL6 receptor antibody) treatment in RA patients significantly reduced serum CRPM in the LITHE and RADIATE trials, indicating that IL-6 is a major factor in CRPM formation [37, 38]. Furthermore, reductions in systemic CRPM—due to tocilizumab—were associated with decreased RA disease activity in RADIATE, and serum CRPM was associated with radiographic OA progression in the Rotterdam cohort [38, 39]. These findings therefore suggest that elevations of CRPM, C3M, and C1M likely reflect an active disease state of cartilage degeneration that precedes structural progression [36].

Fig. 2
figure 2

In Vivo Generation of MMP-Generated Neoepitopes in Inflamed Knee Joints*. Under inflammatory conditions, CRP is produced by the liver and released into the bloodstream [33]. In inflamed joints, MMPs are activated by inflammatory cytokines released by macrophages. These activated MMPs degrade CRP into the CRPM neoepitope [17]. Similarly, native collagen is clipped by Cathepsin K and activated Collagenase MMPs (1, 8 13, 14,) then processed by activated gelatinase MMPs [2, 9, 12, 17] to generate collagen neoepitopes (26-29;41). *Figure made with https://biorender.com/

Full size image

Interestingly, both serum and SF CD163—but not CD14—correlated strongly with both CRPM and C3M. Although often referred to as an M2 or anti-inflammatory marker, we showed by single-cell RNA sequencing that CD163 is also expressed by inflammatory macrophages in OA synovia in conjunction with high expression of pro-inflammatory cytokine genes including IL1A, IL1B, IL6, TNF, CCL2, and CCL3 [40]. While CD14 was expressed by various macrophage types, it was also expressed on activated fibrocytes suggesting a role in wound healing. Although the reasons for the distinct associations of CRPM and C3M with CD163 are not clear at this time, these data are nevertheless consistent with the generation of CRPM and C3M by a macrophage-related process in OA joints.

This study was limited by a small sample size (n=25 participants) with a small number of directly aspirated synovial fluid samples (n=18). Unlike hsCRP, CRPM does not appear to be confounded by BMI; however, this cohort had a mean BMI of 29.2 kg/m2 (range 22.49–38.40) and the association of CRPM with knee OA inflammation should be evaluated in a larger cohort with a higher mean and median BMI. We previously identified associations of knee synovitis, measured by etarfolatide imaging, with synovial fluid MMP-3 and TIMP-1, suggesting these markers represent localized inflammation [40]; however, these markers were not associated with CRPM. This might be explained by the fact that the MMP analyses in this study were measures of total protein and not MMP activity that would be expected to more robustly correlate with MMP-generated epitopes. In addition, the study may have lacked sufficient power to detect a correlation due to small sample size. As our goal was to qualify biomarkers of OA inflammation using easily accessible biofluids, we focused on systemic (serum) CRPM, CRP, C1M, and C3M assays; we did not analyze any of these markers in synovial fluid.

Conclusions

In summary, to our knowledge, this is the first time that CRPM has been shown to be associated with knee and multi-joint inflammation based on objective imaging (etarfolatide) and biomarker (CD163) measures. Furthermore, serum CRPM associations with knee and multi-joint OA-related synovitis are independent of BMI. The correlation of serum CRPM with serum and SF CD163 supports the generation of CRPM by MMPs under conditions of chronic macrophage-related inflammation in OA. In contrast, serum CRP was associated with both BMI and radiographic knee osteophyte severity. These results demonstrate the capability of biomarker measurements to reflect complex biological processes and for neoepitope markers to more distinctly reflect acute processes than their precursor proteins. In conclusion, CRPM represents a potential molecular biomarker alternative to etarfolatide imaging for quantitative assessment of joint inflammation in OA in the absence of other inflammatory conditions. In addition, given that CRPM is generated by MMP-1 and MMP-8 during inflammation, CRPM may be useful as an activity marker of inflammation in other tissues.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CRP:

C-reactive protein

hsCRP:

High-sensitivity CRP

MMP:

Matrix metalloproteinase

CRPM:

MMP-generated neoepitope of CRP

C1M:

MMP-generated neoepitope of type I collagen

C3M:

MMP-generated neoepitope of type III collagen

OA:

Osteoarthritis

IL:

Interleukin

K-L:

Kellgren-Lawrence

NHANES:

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

PAS:

pain, aching, stiffness

WOMAC:

Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis

JSN:

Joint space narrowing

OST:

Osteophyte severity

LLOD:

Lower limit of detection

TIMP-1:

Tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases 1

NE:

Neutrophil elastase

SF:

Synovial fluid

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor α

References

  1. Goldring MB, Otero M. Inflammation and osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2011;23(5):471–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/BOR.0b013e328349c2b1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Berenbaum F. Osteoarthritis as an inflammatory disease (osteoarthritis is not osteoarthrosis!). Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21(1):16–21. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.joca.2012.11.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Orlowsky E, Kraus VB. The role of innate immunity in Osteoarthritis: when our first line of defense goes on the offensive. J Rheumatology. 2015;42(3):363–71. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3899/jrheum.140382 PMID: 25593231; PMCID: PMC4465583.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yin W-H, Chen J-W, Jen H-L, Chiang M-C, Huang W-P, Feng A-N, et al. Independent prognostic value of evaluated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in chronic heart failure. Am Heart J. 2004;147(5):931–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ahj.2003.11.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Soinio M, Marniemi J, Laasko M, Lehto S, Rönnemaa T. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and coronary heart disease mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Pathophysiol Complic. 2006; 292:329-333. doi: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1700.

  6. Datta S, Iqbal Z, Prasad KR. Comparison between serum hsCRP and LDL cholesterol for search of a better predictor of ischemic heart disease. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2011;26(2):210–3. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s12291-010-0100-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Daghestani HN, Kraus VB. Inflammatory biomarkers in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23(11):1890–6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.joca.2015.02.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lochhead P, Khalili H, Ananthakrishnan AN, Richter JM, Chan AT. Association between circulating levels of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 and risk of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(6):818–24. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.cgh.2016.01.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tayefi M, Tajfard M, Saffar S, Hanachi P, Amirabadizadeh AR, et al. hs-CRP is strongly associated with coronary heart disease (CHD): a data mining approach using decision tree algorithm. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017;141:105–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.02.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jin X, BeguerieJR ZW, Blizzard L, Otahal P, Jones G, et al. Circulating C-reactive protein in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(4):703–10. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204494.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Engström G, Gerhardsson de Verdier M, Rollof J, Nilsson PM, Lohmander LS. C-reactive protein, metabolic syndrome and incidence of severe hip and knee osteoarthritis. A population-based cohort study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17(2):168–73. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.joca.2008.07.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Livshits G, Zhai G, Hart DJ, Kato BS, Wang H, Williams FMK, et al. Interluekin-6 is a significant predictor of radiographic knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(7):2037–45. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/art.24598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Fields GB. Interstitial collagen catabolism. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(13):8785–93. 23430258. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1074/jbc.R113.451211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Leeming DJ, He Y, Veidal SS, Nguyen QHT, Larsen DJ, Koizumi M, et al. A novel marker for assessment of liver matrix remodeling: An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) detecting a MMP generated type I collagen neoepitope (C1M). Biomarkers. 2011;16(7):616–28. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3109/1354750X.2011.620628.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vassiliadis E, Larsen DV, Clausen RE, Veidal SS, Barascuk N, Larsen L, et al. Measurement of CO3-610, a potential liver biomarker derived from matrix metalloproteinase-9 degradation of collagen type III, in a rat model of reversible carbon-tetrachloride-induced fibrosis. Biomark Insights. 2011;6:649–58. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.4137/BMI.S6347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Barascuk N, Vassiliadis E, Zheng Q, Wang Y, Wang W, Larsen L, et al. Levels of circulating MMCN-151, a degradation product of mimecan, reflect pathological extracellular matrix remodeling in apolipoprotein E knockout mice. Biomark Insights. 2011;6:97–106. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.4137/BMI.S7777.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Skjøt-Arkil H, Schett G, Zhang C, Larsen DV, Wang Y, Zheng Q, et al. Investigation of two novel biochemical markers of inflammation, matrix metalloproteinase and cathepsin generated fragments of C-reactive protein, in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30(3):371–9. 22339813.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bharadwaj D, Stein M-P, Volzer M, Mold C, Du Clos TW. The major receptor for C-reactive protein on leukocytes is Fcγ receptor II. J Exp Med. 1999;190(4):585–90. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1084/jem.190.4.585 PMID: 10449529.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jabłońska-Trypuć A, Matejczyk M, Rosochacki S. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), the main extracellular matrix (ECM) enzymes in collagen degradation, as a target for anticancer drugs. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2016;31(sup1):177–83. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3109/14756366.2016.1161620.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Karsdal MA, Kraus VB, Shevell D, Bay-Jensen AC, Schattenberg JM, Surabattula R, et al. Profiling and targeting connective tissue remodeling in autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev. 2021;20(1):102706. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Siebuhr AS, Peterson KK, Arendt-Nielsen L, Egsgaard LL, Eskehave T, Christiansen C, et al. Identification and characterisation of osteoarthritis patients with inflammation derived tissue turnover. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22(1):44–50. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.joca.2013.10.020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bay-Jensen AC, Bihlet A, Byrjalsen I, Andersen JR, Riis BJ, Christiansen C, et al. Serum C-reactive protein metabolite (CRPM) is associated with incidence of contralateral knee osteoarthritis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6583. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/s41598-021-86064-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Arendt-Nielsen L, Eskehave TN, Egsgaard LL, Peterson KK, Graven-Nielson T, Hoeck HC, et al. Association between experimental pain biomarkers and serological markers in patients with different degrees of painful knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. Dec 2014;66(12):3317–26. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/art.38856.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Huebner JL, Landerman LR, Somers TJ, Keefe FJ, Guilak F, Blumenthal JA, et al. Exploratory secondary analyses of a cognitive-behavioral intervention for knee osteoarthritis demonstrate reduction in biomarkers of adipocyte inflammation. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016;24(9):1528–34. 27090577. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.joca.2016.04.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Loeser RF, Beavers DP, Bay-Jensen AC, Karsdal MA, Nicklas BJ, Guermazi A, et al. Effects of dietary weight loss with and without exercise on interstitial matrix turnover and tissue inflammation biomarkers in adults with knee osteoarthritis: the Intensive Diet and Exercise for Arthritis trial (IDEA). Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017;25(11):1822–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.joca.2017.07.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kraus VB, McDaniel G, Huebner JL, Stabler TV, Pieper CF, Shipes SH, et al. Direct in vivo evidence of activated macrophages in human osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016;24(9):1613–21. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.joca.2016.04.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hsueh MF, Zhang X, Wellman SS, Bolognesi MP, Kraus VB. Synergistic roles of macrophages and neutrophils in osteoarthritis progression. Arthritis Rheum. 2021;73(1):89–99. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/art.41486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. National Center for Health Statistics. Basic data on arthritis knee, hip, and sacroiliac joints, in adults ages 25-74 years, United States, 1971-1975. Rockville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1979. (Vital and health statistics. Series 11, no. 213) (DHEW publication no. (PHS) 79-1661).

  29. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15(12):1833–40. 3068365.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Haraden CA, Huebner JL, Hsueh MF, Li YJ, Kraus VB. Synovial fluid biomarkers associated with osteoarthritis severity reflect macrophage and neutrophil related inflammation. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):146. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13075-019-1923-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Vexler A, Tao G, Chen X. A toolkit for clinical statisticians to fix problems based on biomarker measurements subject to instrumental limitations: from repeated measurement techniques to a hybrid pooled-unpooled design. In: Armstrong D, editor. Advanced protocols in oxidative stress III. New York: Springer; 2015. p. 439–60. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/978-1-4939-1441-8_31.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Daghestani HN, Pieper CF, Kraus VB. Soluble macrophage biomarkers indicate inflammatory phenotypes in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. Apr 2015;67(4):956–65. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/art.39006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Giudice MD, Gangestad SW. Rethinking IL-6 and CRP: Why they are more than inflammatory biomarkers, and why it matters. Brain Behav Immun. May 2018;70:61–75. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.bbi.2018.02.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kjelgaard-Peterson C, Siebuhr AS, Christiansen T, Ladel C, Karsdal M, Bay-Jenson AC. Synovitis biomarkers: ex vivo characterization of three biomarkers for identification of inflammatory osteoarthritis. Biomarkers. 2015;20(8):547–56. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3109/1354750X.2015.1105497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lambert C, Duduc J-E, Montell E, Vergés J, Munaut C, Noël A, et al. Gene expression pattern of cells from inflamed and normal areas of osteoarthritis synovial membrane. Arthritis Rheum. 2014;66(4):960–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/art.38315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bay-Jensen AC, Kjelgaard-Peterson CF, Peterson KK, Arendt-Nielsen L, Quasnichka HL, Mobasheri A, et al. Aggrecanase degradation of type III collagen is associated with clinical knee pain. Clin Biochem. Aug 2018;58:37–43. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.04.022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bay Jensen AC, Platt A, Byrjalsen I, Vergnoud P, Christiansen C, Karsdal MA. Effect of tocilizumab combined with methotrexate on circulating biomarkers of synovium, cartilage, and bone in the LITHE study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014;43(4):470–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.07.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Juhl P, Thudium CS, Gudmann NS, Karsdal MA, Bay-Jensen AC, Siebuhr AS. IL-6 receptor inhibition modulates type III collagen and C-reactive protein degradation in rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy: analysis of connective tissue turnover in the tocilizumab RADIATE study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018;36(4):568–74. 29465346.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hosnijeh SF, Siebuhr AS, Uitterlinden AG, Oei EHG, Hofman A, Karsdal MA, et al. Association between biomarkers of tissue inflammation and progression of osteoarthritis: evidence from the Rotterdam study cohort. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18(1):81. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13075-016-0976-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Chou CH, Jain V, Gibson J, Attarian DE, Haraden CA, Yohn CB, et al. Synovial cell cross-talk with cartilage plays a major role in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):10868. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/s41598-020-67730-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No additional acknowledgements.

Funding

This work was supported in part by NIH/NIA P30-AG028716.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, PO Box 104775, Carmichael Building, 300 N. Duke St, Durham, NC, 27701, USA

    Louie C. Alexander Jr, Grant McHorse, Janet L. Huebner & Virginia B. Kraus

  2. ImmunoScience, Nordic Bioscience, Herlev, Denmark

    Anne-Christine Bay-Jensen & Morten A. Karsdal

  3. Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, PO Box 104775, Carmichael Building, 300 N. Duke St, Durham, NC, 27701, USA

    Virginia B. Kraus

Authors
  1. Louie C. Alexander Jr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Grant McHorse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Janet L. Huebner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anne-Christine Bay-Jensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Morten A. Karsdal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Virginia B. Kraus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LCA analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted and revised the manuscript; GM performed ELISAs for data acquisition and revised the manuscript; JLH contributed to the study design, data interpretation, and revisions; ACBJ contributed to the data interpretation and revision; MAK contributed to the data interpretation and revision; VBK contributed to the study design, data interpretation, drafting, and revision. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Virginia B. Kraus.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study is a secondary analysis of samples derived from a previously reported pilot trial (NCT01237405). All procedures were conducted according to Declaration of Helsinki principles and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Duke University Medical Center.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

Dr. Anne Bay-Jensen and Dr. Morten Karsdal are employees and shareholders of Nordic Biosciences. No other authors have any conflicts related to commercial interests in terms of stock, ownership, or honoraria.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alexander, L.C., McHorse, G., Huebner, J.L. et al. A matrix metalloproteinase-generated neoepitope of CRP can identify knee and multi-joint inflammation in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 23, 226 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13075-021-02610-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13075-021-02610-y

Keywords

Arthritis Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1478-6362

Contact us