Skip to main content

Table 3 Within- and between-group differences in primary and secondary outcome measures based on the general linear mix model analysis

From: Examining the influence of pain neuroscience education followed by a Pilates exercises program in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Variables

Group

Baseline

Mean (SD)

Eight weeks

Mean (SD)

Change relative to baseline (%)

Group Difference, Mean (95% CI)

ES (ηp2)†

P-value

Pain (0–20)

PNE followed by PEs

10.6 (2.8)

7.3 (2.3)

-31.1

-0.8 (-2.2 to 0.7)

0.04

0.288

PEs

10.7 (3.2)

8.1 (2.9)

-24.3

Physical limitation (0–68)

PNE followed by PEs

29 (8.4)

22.7 (7.2)

-21.7

-0.4 (-4 to 3.1)

0.02

0.812

PEs

28.5 (7.5)

23.1 (5.9)

-18.9

Pain catastrophizing (0–52)

PNE followed by PEs

26.1 (7.2)

16.2 (5.6)

-37.9

-3.9 (-7.2 to -0.6)

0.51Â¥

0.021

PEs

24.9 (8)

20.1 (6.5)

-19.3

Kinesiophobia (17–68)

PNE followed by PEs

43.7 (7.8)

34.3 (7.3)

-21.5

-4.2 (-8.1 to -0.4)

0.39Â¥

0.032

PEs

42.9 (7.5)

38.5 (6.8)

-10.3

Self-efficacy (0–60)

PNE followed by PEs

34.1 (7.5)

47.9 (7.2)

40.5

6.1 (0.7 to 11.5)

0.13

0.028

PEs

34.4 (11.8)

41.8 (12.0)

21.5

Function (s)

PNE followed by PEs

12.1 (2)

9.2 (1.6)

-24

-0.8 (-1.8 to 0.1)

0.05

0.069

PEs

12.2 (2.1)

10.1 (1.8)

-17.2

  1. Abbreviations: †, Effect size (partial eta squared); ¥, Large effect size (0.14), CI Confidence Interval, PEs Pilates exercises, PNE followed by PE Pain neuroscience education followed by Pilates exercises